I have been neglecting this blog lately and unfortunately it isn't because I've had so much fun living my post treatment, cancer free life that I didn't have time. I wish I could say that. Nope, I have hit another bump in my road to recovery and that bump is called Oncoblot. The Oncoblot test, as described on their website identifies a specific type of protein in the blood, ENOX2, which exists only on the surface of a malignant cancer cell. The ENOX2 proteins are shed into circulation and can be detected in the blood. These proteins serve as highly sensitive markers for confirmation of cancer presence meaning that because my test came back positive, I still have malignant cancer cells in my body.
The main study that was done using this test can be found here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901999/
Essentially they took 110 people with no signs of cancer, tested them using the Oncoblot and 40% were positive for the ENOX2 protein. This may seem like a lot but those are the statistics, 2 out of 5 Canadians (45% of men and 42% of women) are expected to develop cancer during their lifetimes. That is the sad reality of the toxic world we live in.
The positive part of this study was that after completion of 3 to 17 months of Capsol-T use, 94% of subjects subsequently tested negative for ENOX2 presence. This can be attributed to the fact that the Oncoblot detects cancer at such an early stage that in most cases it can be reversed by making lifestyle changes and using natural supplements.
What does this all mean for me? It means that the malignant cells still floating around in my body could be killed with the supplements that I have been taking or they could not. My need for control makes me want to do more to ensure that the next time I take this test it will be negative. At $1,700 each time, it better be negative....but how can this be done? That is where the hours of research come in, hence my absence from the blog.
For anyone who wants to take the Oncoblot in Canada, it can usually be ordered by a Naturopath. Just beware that your Oncologist will know nothing about it and because it is a test they do not routinely use, if it comes back positive, there is nothing they can do. Understandably, this can create a lot of frustration so be prepared before you even go there. I am glad I took it as it confirmed in my mind that some type of additional treatment is needed. What treatment is still to be determined.
Tuesday, 28 June 2016
Thursday, 2 June 2016
Debating Between Mastectomy and Lumpectomy - Part 2
A few weeks ago I published a post that seems to be getting a fair amount of traffic about a lumpectomy versus mastectomy. Sometimes I make light of it but in reality this is a very difficult choice. I am the type of person that needs to research and have all of the available information before making a decision. For example, before going out to a restaurant, I usually look up the menu ahead of time and will still take forever to decide what I want. I am the one at the table asking for more time or debating between a garden salad or calamari while the waitress and everyone else sits there waiting. If it takes that much effort to choose an appetizer, you can only imagine what was going through my mind when presented with surgery options.
When making any life changing decision, I think a pros and cons list is in order! For that reason, I thought I would share mine, in case it helps anyone else with this impossible task.
Lumpectomy
Pros:
1. Least invasive surgery.
2. Shorter recovery time.
3. No implant or further procedures needed.
Cons:
1. Chance that there could be unclear margins and a second surgery would be required (estimates show this happens for approximately 20-25% of women which was way too high for me). There is also some speculation that if the surgeon doesn't remove the whole tumor, they may break the perimeter and allow more cells to escape into the body.
2. Some studies like the one I posted earlier show that lumpectomy may not be as effective in younger women. Of course there are also other studies contradicting this.
3. My tumor was large relative to the size of my breast so a lumpectomy would have taken quite a bit of my breast tissue and the cosmetic result wouldn't have been great.
Unilateral Mastectomy
Pros:
1. Most breast tissue would be removed (according to the surgeon, there will always be some remaining so the chance of recurrence in the tissue is never 100% gone, just greatly reduced).
2. This procedure would give me the best chance at clear margins. An MRI before my last chemo showed residual tumor so this was especially important.
Cons:
1. Longer recovery time including a drain.
2. Tissue expander would be needed as I knew I did not want to be completely flat.
3. Cosmetic result isn't ideal.
4. Additional surgery later on to replace the expander with an implant.
Bi-lateral Mastectomy
Pros:
1. Both breasts have an axe wound through them (ok, I'm over exaggerating) but at least they look the same.
2. If breast cancer can develop in one breast, it can happen in the other.
3. On message boards I have read about way too many women that either decided to have both breasts removed and a) the "healthy breast" ended up having cancer cells that were not detected on imaging or b) they developed a new cancer years later in the opposite breast.
4. Even though doctors say the chances of developing a new cancer in the opposite breast are only approximately 10-14%, they still have no idea what caused my cancer so I don't have much confidence in that statistic.
5. Women whose first breast cancer was hormone receptor-negative may have a higher risk of a second primary breast cancer compared to those whose first breast cancer was hormone receptor-positive. This risk was even greater for women who were initially diagnosed with HR-negative tumors when younger than 30 years.
* I also found this article in the Wall Street Journal about increasing numbers of women that choose a double mastectomy. It offers some interesting perspectives from both doctors and patients that I could relate to.
Con:
1. The physical and psychological effects of having both my breasts removed.
2. Two surgeries and going through the tissue expansion process twice.
* If I would have pushed back on the surgeon and asked more questions, the mastectomy and tissue expander insertion on both sides could have been performed in one surgery. This is why I stress being your own advocate!
3. Higher risk of complications.
There could be totally different pros and cons on someone else's list which is why surgery is such a personal decision. For example, I did not include my husband or anything to do with my personal relationship on this list as he was fully supportive regardless of my decision but I understand that can be a factor. Radiation was also recommended regardless of the surgery I chose.
Ultimately I went with a double mastectomy and am currently recovering from my second surgery. No cancer cells were found in my "healthy breast" but there were micro calcifications in the ducts which can suggest areas of increased activity in some breast cells. This finding could be an early indication of cancer that may have developed down the road or it could have remained completely benign and never caused any problems. For me, this was one of the factors reinforcing that I had made the right decision. At the end of the day, feeling confident that you have done the best you can is all anyone can ask for!
When making any life changing decision, I think a pros and cons list is in order! For that reason, I thought I would share mine, in case it helps anyone else with this impossible task.
Lumpectomy
Pros:
1. Least invasive surgery.
2. Shorter recovery time.
3. No implant or further procedures needed.
Cons:
1. Chance that there could be unclear margins and a second surgery would be required (estimates show this happens for approximately 20-25% of women which was way too high for me). There is also some speculation that if the surgeon doesn't remove the whole tumor, they may break the perimeter and allow more cells to escape into the body.
2. Some studies like the one I posted earlier show that lumpectomy may not be as effective in younger women. Of course there are also other studies contradicting this.
3. My tumor was large relative to the size of my breast so a lumpectomy would have taken quite a bit of my breast tissue and the cosmetic result wouldn't have been great.
Unilateral Mastectomy
Pros:
1. Most breast tissue would be removed (according to the surgeon, there will always be some remaining so the chance of recurrence in the tissue is never 100% gone, just greatly reduced).
2. This procedure would give me the best chance at clear margins. An MRI before my last chemo showed residual tumor so this was especially important.
Cons:
1. Longer recovery time including a drain.
2. Tissue expander would be needed as I knew I did not want to be completely flat.
3. Cosmetic result isn't ideal.
4. Additional surgery later on to replace the expander with an implant.
Bi-lateral Mastectomy
Pros:
1. Both breasts have an axe wound through them (ok, I'm over exaggerating) but at least they look the same.
2. If breast cancer can develop in one breast, it can happen in the other.
3. On message boards I have read about way too many women that either decided to have both breasts removed and a) the "healthy breast" ended up having cancer cells that were not detected on imaging or b) they developed a new cancer years later in the opposite breast.
4. Even though doctors say the chances of developing a new cancer in the opposite breast are only approximately 10-14%, they still have no idea what caused my cancer so I don't have much confidence in that statistic.
5. Women whose first breast cancer was hormone receptor-negative may have a higher risk of a second primary breast cancer compared to those whose first breast cancer was hormone receptor-positive. This risk was even greater for women who were initially diagnosed with HR-negative tumors when younger than 30 years.
* I also found this article in the Wall Street Journal about increasing numbers of women that choose a double mastectomy. It offers some interesting perspectives from both doctors and patients that I could relate to.
Con:
1. The physical and psychological effects of having both my breasts removed.
2. Two surgeries and going through the tissue expansion process twice.
* If I would have pushed back on the surgeon and asked more questions, the mastectomy and tissue expander insertion on both sides could have been performed in one surgery. This is why I stress being your own advocate!
3. Higher risk of complications.
There could be totally different pros and cons on someone else's list which is why surgery is such a personal decision. For example, I did not include my husband or anything to do with my personal relationship on this list as he was fully supportive regardless of my decision but I understand that can be a factor. Radiation was also recommended regardless of the surgery I chose.
Ultimately I went with a double mastectomy and am currently recovering from my second surgery. No cancer cells were found in my "healthy breast" but there were micro calcifications in the ducts which can suggest areas of increased activity in some breast cells. This finding could be an early indication of cancer that may have developed down the road or it could have remained completely benign and never caused any problems. For me, this was one of the factors reinforcing that I had made the right decision. At the end of the day, feeling confident that you have done the best you can is all anyone can ask for!