Debating Between Mastectomy and Lumpectomy?

If you have been diagnosed with breast cancer, either a surgeon or oncologist would likely have discussed the options of a lumpectomy or mastectomy with you. Like me, the first thing you probably asked is whether one is more effective than the other. During the information gathering process (which can be non-existent for some women as you feel forced to make a decision so quickly), I was told that long term survival did not differ regardless of which option I chose. Not so says the following article:

Age May Affect Outcomes With Breast Surgery

This study found that women 45 or younger had a 20-year local recurrence rate of 25% with breast conservation versus 11% for older women. Rates of local recurrence after mastectomy were 13% for younger patients and 3% for the older subgroup in the study population of 1,076 patients. In my case if a mastectomy gave me even a 1% better chance of never having the cancer come back, I was going to take it. A double mastectomy? Sure, might as well remove them both and reduce my risk even more.

My point is that a lot of people have opinions on what kind of surgery is best but it's your body and you have to be the one to decide. I think it is important for women to educate themselves about their options outside of what your surgeon, oncologist, radiologist, genetics counsellor etc. recommend. For example, when I said I wanted a double mastectomy both my surgeon and radiologist were very against it. With comments like "why would you cut off a perfectly healthy breast?" and "you know it won't increase your chances of survival" I seriously doubted my decision. By the time my next appointments with both doctors rolled around, they were perfectly fine with my decision and did not question it at all. It's almost like they were testing me to see how serious I was. When someone makes the decision to cut off their breasts, I would think they are pretty damn serious but either way, I guess I passed the test. My genetics councillor on the other hand was very supportive of my decision saying that the chances of developing cancer in the other breast are small, but they increase with age meaning that in 20 years, that risk could be quite high. This is especially true if you are triple negative.

It's such a tough decision and one you probably never thought you would have to make. At this age, I thought I would be deciding on baby names but that's not the way things worked out. This is getting depressing and that was not the intent of the post so I'll cut it off here but hope this information was helpful to you in some way.